Sierra Club Sues Pismo Beach to Halt Spanish Springs
Development Would Increase Carbon Pollution Emissions, Deplete Water Supply
and Threaten Wildlife
The Sierra Club has filed suit against the City of Pismo Beach
over the controversial proposed Spanish Springs project, citing deficiencies
in the projects Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
Spanish Springs, if approved, would significantly expand the size of the
city and bring more than 400 homes, 150 hotel rooms, a conference center,
condos, vineyards and a golf course into the rural Price Canyon area north
of Pismo Beach.
At its June 18 meeting, the City Council certified the Spanish Springs EIR
and authorized amendments to the city's General Plan, paving the way for the
ultimate approval of the development agreement. But the Environmental Impact
Report for the project omits a management plan for a proposed nature
preserve, inadequately mitigates carbon pollution emissions that cause
climate disruption, and fails to protect water resources and wildlife.
"The developers of Spanish Springs have not shown exactly how their project
will handle the increased traffic and greenhouse gas emissions it proposes
to bring to the area, provide an adequate water supply, or protect
threatened species," said Andrew Christie, director of the Sierra Clubs
Santa Lucia Chapter. "The environmental analysis essentially leaves the
details to be figured out later. The citizens of Pismo Beach deserve a full
analysis, clearly stating and mitigating this projects harmful
environmental impacts."
Of particular concern to the Sierra Club is the nature preserve that is to
be created and managed on the project site. The Sierra Club believes that
the lack of a management plan for the preserve undermines its conservation
value, and habitat fragmentation is likely because the EIR defers or omits
important details and performance standards, including a buffer for a
planned wildlife corridor and the mapping of riparian areas and wetlands.
"For six months, the Sierra Club told the City Council that the EIR is
legally inadequate and they needed to reject it and prepare a substantially
revised analysis," said attorney Babak Naficy. "They pretty much ignored
everything we pointed out, or argued that they didnt have to fix these
serious problems, which were also pointed out by the Air Pollution Control
District, National Marine Fisheries Service, the San Luis Coastal Resource
Conservation District and other agencies but were swept aside by the City."
"Spanish Springs is the poster child for Pismo Beachs growing reputation as
the city that never says no to sprawl," said Santa Lucia Chapter Chair Greg
McMillan. "The city council and staff apparently learned nothing from the
expensive failure of Los Robles del Mar. That project and this one have
starkly highlighted the close relationship between the City and private
developers. Pismo Beach needs City Council members who understand
sustainable land use planning."
Good land use planning is a simple solution to suburban sprawl, which ties
with crime as a top local concern for most Americans, who spend an average
of 55 workdays in traffic every year.
Belted Kingfisher Image on Banner by Cleve Nash |